I am going to deal with each of these points in turn - with the benefit of hindsight on the first 6 months of Trump 47. I am going to try to get these in front of Bob, but if anyone who sees this can also forward them, I would be grateful.
1. The missing variable in the moral philosophy of economics is cultural theory. I am writing about that now. Michael Foucault, in one of his Paris lectures, addressed Homo Economicus and hit the nail on the head. Political Science has followed Economics into empiricism - so it is of little help. Moral philosophy, without cultural theory as a context, is anecdotal for all intents and purposes.
The rules of the economy are based in culture. Most of the working class behaves as obliged to by reason and threat, while the hierarchical culture gives its membership at least the appearance of due process. The former deals with sensory input, the latter by shared intuition. As I discussed in a public forum with Gar Alperovitz, the answer to getting them to pursue change is a better mix of cash and prizes - not through trying to radicalize them with political proposals. In other words, some type of employer needs to offer a better mix of consumption, finance, housing, government - with libertarian socialism in some form - which eventually destroys politics - becoming the new paradigm. Until them, as Marx said, anything that capitalism does to make things worse makes permanent change more likely - unless government steps in to improve the cage workers are in.
2. The problem is capitalism. Saying it is corporations is tiptoeing through the minefield. Workers are property. The Libertarian assumption is that every day of work is a new contract freely negotiated, rather than an agreement for continued wage slavery. The JFK/LBJ 1965 tax cuts are what unleashed capitalists - who took what was given them and, because they now had an interest in doing so - pushed for more.
3. CEOs will set their own pay until employee-owners get the power to force CEO candidates to bid for their jobs in open auction and then vote among the bottom 3. As for intergenerational wealth, within three generations the management class takes control and nepo-babies drink themselves into an early grave or spend it away.
4. Campaign bribery is a function, not a cause, of capitalism. It also causes the rules to be changed to its advantage.
6. Global trade and the "free market" are bipartisan neoliberalism, which Bill and Hillary copied to get their share of the campaign finance system. The Democrats have now put the electoral game over governing. Also, bankruptcy reform happened with the full cooperation of Jim Moran - a Democrat. The Trump trade policy has destroyed neo-liberalism. Be careful what you wish for.
7. Taxing the rich is social democracy. Socialism happens when employees elect their CEOs and/or make them bid on their salaries. Social Security is the most basic form. We do SD, but do it badly.
8. Our lack of purchasing power is a function of bad economic policy. Cost of Living Increases are granted as a percentage of current wages, rather than as an equal dollar increase in all salaries. Prices change the median dollar, which is paid at the 90th percentile. Economic figures support this. If the minimum wage went up in the same manner, there would be little poverty. Democrats won't go all in on making the minimum wage permanent, as it is a better talking point than a change that would cost them campaign contributions.
9. Government spending on social programs, government contracts and salaries is first order growth. Private sector spending comes along as a second order effect, with plant and equipment spending is third order spending. All for a higher minimum wage. Biden did not do it, even with a majority. Some degree of concentration may be helpful - as long as there are more than one libertarian socialist cooperatives - but vertical integration is essential. Prices did go up when the pandemic gave too many people in good jobs enough money to invest in Crypto, crap and bidding up the price of essentials. Again, costs change the 90th percentile. How we do cost of living adjustments cause inflation.
10. Air pollution, etc., is regulated in the U.S., but we offshore much of it to China and other developing nations by sending them our trash or our trash producing industries. They will soon collapse because of population loss and party infighting. Authoritarians tend to eat each other.
Global warming's processing is not generally known, although in the northern hemisphere, people are starting to pay attention due to the fact that we passed the point of no return in about 2016. Actually, it was more like 1990. Here is how it works. Since 1958, people had lots of cars and warming really started with vigor. Pacific warming sent wet winds to the N. American west coast, where the water was dropped and the warmth carried over to the Atlantic, picking up much more water and even more temperature. See the work Seager who explains this - under the heading of why Europe is warmer than America at the same latitudes. As Sigurd Lind has found, much of the warmth has made its way to Barents Sea. According to measurements started in 1980 - which likely represent what happened since 1958 IMHO - warm the Sea by 7 degrees F a decade. Over 7 decades, that one bottom of water has increased 50 degrees Fahrenheit. No other place has caught so much climate change. The answer is to ban gasoline powered cars -as this produced the problem - and replace them with tethered electric vehicles that can drive themselves home. To get this kind of thing adopted, people abandoning the South and Southwest is the necessary condition - along with more employee-ownership - or corporate employers in individual cities banning cars or uniting behind such a change as a workforce issue.
BONUS. Agree that conditions led to Trumpism, but it is also a result of Democratic Party politics - mainly women voting on a pro-choice ticket when they don't need to mention the issue. Other women get it. Also, Dems don't really make changes upending the neo-liberal status quo. Trump has - as promised. Oops. Some say that undoing Neolib consensus was necessary anyway because China and other Asian nations are collapsing under population decline - for either economic or environmental reasons. We need a new paradigm. Until we do, we get grievance, which almost always leads to a fascistic response.